However given the nature of the perverse nature of the guy who brought up the joke I'm pretty sure there was some validity not to give him a benefit of a doubt.
Anyone that actually knows JoE doesn't take the pervy stuff seriously. o.o
So there's no validity in it, and I'm sure your apology is appreciated.
Too bad then because it actually has a different meaning. I thought people here have matured.
I'll bite actually, since this is happening.
GM asked why you're a mod, because they wanna know why you stick around a place you equate to a website that's notorious for people that post childporn and other such sites of porn and such.
You proceeded to call him an imbecile. When questioned on this, you said you thought everyone had matured. In the conversation line you're literally the least mature participant.
It's both a valid question from GM, a valid observation by Damanos and it begs the obvious question to the admins.
Do you guys(admins, remember) think so little of us that you're willing to let a moderator openly disrespect members for nothing? I get it, this is a website. It's not a business, it's not a job. It's a hangout, and even for the mods and admins - it's a hangout with some obligation at most. So you're not obligated to quality service, I get that. I understand it.
But do you really think a website that lasts is one where the staff lets one of its public faces pick on and insult members? There is a level of integrity, hangout or not, that moderators have to be obligated to uphold if you want people to stick around.