Last few posts;
I think you're talking about Law's physical weaknesses. The thing about your assumption, if I guessed correctly, is that we don't know what physical potential Law had. His DF powers, which he presumably got in childhood, enables him to focus on teleportation instead of physically moving through space. That focus on DF speed is why he is physically slower. We can't say that child Law could not have achieved the kind of physical strength and speed that we see Luffy or DD use. And he would've had to if he didn't have his DF. One thing that hints at Law's physical and mental potential is his mastery over haki. According to you: Law is weak; and yet he is capable of matching Smoker's haki, DD's haki - That shows that Law is not weak without his DF.
Anyway, hypothetical isolation of character and ability to gauge what's stronger helps my point that Law isn't perfect or undefeatable.
Again, I have no idea why you told me this. Has nothing to do with my post. If you think it does, you didn't read carefully or you did but didn't understand.
If you don't understand my post, then maybe you're not as clever as you spect people to be with some of your posts. You said it's freeze. And I said call it whatever you want, his point it's still true, so being it freeze doesn't really matter. So I tell you this cause you arethe one qho said that.
If you were just pointing out he is freeze and not ice, without taking his opinion into acount, just for claryfying things then I may not have answered you, but I don't think it causes you any problem. So either you don't really get why i wrote that for you, what surprises me, cause you usually supose people may understand some things on your posts which aren't totally clear, or you simply need to try making someone feel he has done something wrong once in a while so you feel you're doing well in the forums.
I don't understand your post, seriously, i think ypu are inteligent enough to get why I said that to you...
I don't know what ''spect'' is...
And the bold, which post is that? Though I have to know what ''spect'' is first, in case you're making things up...
precisely why I asked ''why are you telling me that?''. What the hell does that have anything to do with my post?
I did take his opinion into account. So what are you trying to say?
Quoting people with stuff unrelated with their post is not causing problem? Okay, I know the button ''Post'' is there, you have your right to post and you can do whatever the hell you want with it no one can stop you, but I don't want to be disturbed by such thing when I go on the forum and think I'm going to talk and discuss something worth then all I get is something that should not even involve me. And I give you the benefit of the doubt cause I don't think ''this guy is a troll he must have wanted to mess with me''. I think you have a reason, so I ask in case.
Quite the opposite. I either make things very clear, or if I do not make it clear enough, I always ask people why they feel the need to assume it one way instead of asking me what I mean.
Never have I ''demanded'' people to understand all I write. If you have that illusion, then they must be the 1st example. Guys who don't read or read but don't seem to understand. It's like words go through one ear to the other...
I have no idea why you think of that possibility. You did it yourself or?
I'm afraid I don't.
No, because the Gura Gura no Mi doesn't let the user shatter the entire Earth. Whitebeard had that potential because of who he was, but it's not a default of the fruit.
Edited by Petite Fleur, 18 October 2014 - 01:16 PM.