Simply because he thinks it can sail the world does in no way mean it can take damage from anyone
...Still don't read? I never said that meant it can take damage from anyone (wait, what do you mean by ''take damage'' anw? Anything/anyone can take damage, what matters is their states after that LOL. I never said Sunny would be perfectly okay or anything like that if that's what you meant). What I said is
which means it's not normal wood
That's the only conclusion I used from Franky's dialogue and it directly addressed Enbima's ''it's just wood''
So funny thing is you bolded my reasoning (Franky held the Adam wood in high regard...) but somehow left out my conclusion (it's not normal wood) and then went on attacking a conclusion I never made (it can take damage from anyone). Are you just trying to find a way to go at me, classic capu?
Its stupid for u to think yonkou cant destroy "special wood"?
Once again, what you understood is somehow different from what I wrote. Read again! What I said is it's stupid to jump to conclusion. If there's enough evidence (like in the latest chapter) then sure, of course Yonkou can destroy Adam's wood. Before there wasn't, so I don't just trust things LOL. Good for you for being able to trust things so easily.
Oda had not shown all the admirals after Aokiji incident either , yet we all knew them to be powerhouses anyway....but no in ur "logic" that reasoning, while turning out to be true, would have been stupid.....
First of all, again, I don't just trust things because of just hype and crap. Feats are what I need so sorry, I never belong in that ''we'' you spoke of so please stop generalizing or grouping me in that stupid ''we''. I never believed Fuji was that strong until he showed me he was. And same goes for Ryokugyu.
Second, let say I accept that Admirals are strong without feats, it's still a different situation from the Sunny.
We know one of the requirements for being Admiral is being strong. Oda even let Caramel stressed that again when she said BM had potential to be Admirals or Fleet Admirals, which means these positions need strength (although maybe not the only criteria and there could be exception) to achieve, unless you think Caramel was talking about 6 year-old BM's potential for politics/Marines management skills or whatever LOL. Doflamingo also said he heard they were monsters and the fact that they were drafted (not promoted) means they need to be something to be chosen and Akainu was the one in charge so we'd better believe he would do it right. There are a lot of hype and info that says they should be strong, unlike in Sunny's case where the only thing we got is a praise from Franky and nothing else.
Finally, the reasoning and the conclusion are two different things. If you can't comprehend such basic thing then go educate yourself first. You can guess something right thanks to dumb luck or whatever but that doesn't mean your reasoning for getting that conlcusion is sound. For example: 1+1=3 => 2+2=4. The right-handed side is right but not because of the left-handed side...so yeah, the Admirals may turn out to be strong but that doesn't mean your reasoning for that before they showed up and fought is right. ''Turning out to be true'' is a completely irrelevant factor here.
I dont even deny the possibilty u provided it could have very well been true that the adam tree wood would be indestructable, but the likelyness of that was still way lower that the likelyness of a yonkou still damaging it
So you admit the chance is not zero. Yet Enbima was adamant ''wood is just wood'' so clearly he's jumping to conclusion. You just agreed I was right to point that out, good to know.
And no, again, I never said Yonkou couldn't damage it and the debate is never just about whether Yonkou could/could not damage it but how much damage would be done (which could mean no damage but also little damage). I just said the wood could be tougher than Enbima thought so he shouldn't think the ship must be damaged for BM to be worthy of Yonkou title.
Way lower? Where do you get that from? Imaginary land?
so i dont understand why u had to be impolite.....by calling it illogical and wanking....
I said ''or'', not ''and''. Can't read again? And ''illogical'' is impolite? Did you grow up in spoiled environment or you naturally can't take criticism? It's because I think people are wrong/not fully right that I challenge and debate with them, that's a given, unless you're shitting on the whole concept of debating LOL which is baffling because you're doing just that. There's only right or wrong, more likely or less likely here but impolite? There's politeness in terms of HOW you debate though and I don't think calling thing illogical violates that. Saying ''you fucking xyz'' would be and I didn't. And hell if that xyz is true then it's just saying fact and being honest.